Archive for April, 2010

In Praise of Everyday Innovation

Thursday, April 29th, 2010

We’re all innovators, in our own ways. We all work to make our lives better, even if it is on a much smaller scale than the greats who are listed on this site (like Steve Wozniak, a geek after my own heart). One person may pour over their budget and triumph after finding a way that they can save an extra $100 a month, or someone else making a recycling routine for their home an easy lifestyle switch. These little innovations make every one of us innovators, and they should not be overlooked.

I enjoy making some of my own costume like clothing in my spare time. Aside from Home-Ec in the 7th grade, I’ve never had any training with sewing or patterns. I am a self-taught patternmaker, and nothing pleases me more than looking at a finished design and thinking, “I didn’t just make that, I designed it.” Each part of my design process, from sketches to pattern drafting to the clothing construction brings me joy and a sense of accomplishment. I created this. I dreamed that design. I’m an innovator. I’ll never be a major fashion designer; but that doesn’t bother me—I already have a job that I love. I’m an everyday innovator, working on my ideas in my spare time. Tinkering away like Mr. Ford did.

We are all innovators, its part of what defines us as being human. The ability to think and imagine, coupled with the urge to tinker and create, is rooted in human nature. What do you innovate? What is your everyday innovation?

Photo Credit: Mebrett

You Don’t Need Any New Ideas

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010

In my MBA classes last year, I had the students analyse their own firm or organisation using the Innovation Value Chain model developed by Morten Hansen and Julian Birkinshaw.

There are two key points with this model. The first is that there are three stages in the process of innovation: idea generation, selecting and developing ideas, and diffusing ideas (getting them to spread). Critically, all three parts of that process have to be working well in order to innovate successfully.

One very common mistake that I see firms make is over-focusing on idea generation at the expense of execution, so I find this to be an extremely useful model. In particular, I have frequently observed organisations decide that they have to improve their innovation, and then sinking all of their resources and effort into idea generation.

This approach is flawed, and my MBA students demonstrated why. They came from a wide range of organisations – huge multinationals, small start-ups, government departments, and educational institutions. Despite these different backgrounds, their findings were remarkably consistent – only 3 of the 60 organisations that they work in are ideas-poor. The other 57 (that’s 95%!) have problems with either selecting or diffusing ideas.

Scott Berkun, the author of the book The Myths of Innovation, recently had this to say:

If there’s any secret to be derived from Steve Jobs, Jeff Bezos, or any of the dozens of people who often have the name innovator next to their names, is the diversity of talents they had to posses, or acquire, to overcome the wide range of challenges in converting their ideas into successful businesses.

That’s it. The problem is executing your ideas. Here’s an example – mousetraps. They’re a famous innovation example, in part due to famous quote from Ralph Waldo Emerson: “Build a better mousetrap, and the world will beat a path to your door.” But is this actually true?

The patent for the flip-trap mousetrap design was filed in 1899. That’s a better mousetrap, right? We’re still using that design over 110 years later, so it’s probably pretty good. And yet, since 1899, the US Patent Office has granted over 4400 mousetrap patents. They receive more than 400 new mousetrap patents every year. So there’s no shortage of ideas. But fewer than 20 mousetrap designs have led to products that have actually made money.

There is so much effort put into improving innovation by generating more ideas. But that’s not where firms are weak. As my MBA students demonstrated, the real problem is in selecting and executing good ideas, and diffusing them. The mousetraps tell the same story – there a whole lot of ideas, but not many that have come to anything.

Here’s more from Berkun:

The closest thing to a real secret is this: In my years studying and teaching all things innovation, there’s one fact that’s the hardest for people to swallow and it goes as follows – To invent or create is to take a bet against the unknown. No matter what you do, you are still betting you can do well in the face of many things that are out of your control. Don’t like that? Don’t want uncertainty? Then do something else. Comfort with risk and uncertainty is the real secret. Or at least acceptance of the fact you can work your ass off for uncertain rewards.

Where does this leave us? Here are some conclusions:

  • If you’re going to get some help to improve innovation at your firm, don’t focus on generating ideas. Get help on selecting ideas, or on getting them to spread. Those are the hard parts.
  • Innovation is a bet – you’re betting that your new idea will work better, that it will meet needs, that it will fit into the value network. All of these things have to happen for your innovation to work. Like Berkun says, this is a leap into uncertainty.
  • Most of the innovation problems that organisations face are problems with innovation diffusion – the challenge is to get your new ideas to spread.

The new idea that I’d like you to accept is that you don’t need any more new ideas. Instead of generating more ideas, let’s develop some plans for getting better at executing our ideas. That seems like a good idea, doesn’t it?

What do you think?

Photo Credit: Mskogly

A View from the Pit and Paddock [Pic of the Month]

Tuesday, April 27th, 2010

Each month our team at The Henry Ford chooses a collection of photographs to showcase for the Pic of The Month. This guest post is from Pete Kalinski, Archivist for The Henry Ford on photographer Dave Friedman.

During the 1950s and 1960s, American automobile racing underwent a radical transformation, evolving from a sport of weekend racers in their home-built hot rods and dragsters, to professional teams driving powerful racecars in competitions all over the world.

Photographer Dave Friedman had a front row seat on the action during this important transition, capturing the excitement, the grit and the glamour–and creating some of the most iconic images of American motor sports of that era.

In 1962, 23-year-old Friedman was hired as staff photographer for Shelby-American Inc., the racing design and construction shop owned by former driver Carroll Shelby.  Here, Friedman had the unique opportunity to document the development of one of racing’s iconic cars, the Shelby Cobra. (Click here to hear legendary racecar driver and builder Carroll Shelby talk about building this car and about his career).  In 1966 and 1967, Friedman was hired by Ford Motor Company to document the company’s racing program.  Friedman captured the final development of the first American-designed and built racecars that dominated the grueling 24-Hours of Le Mans race between 1966 and 1969.   After moving into the film industry, Friedman continued to pursue his passion for motor sports into the 1990s, when he refocused his lens on a different art form – classical ballet.

See additional pictures and read more on David Friedman on Pic Of The Month.

The Collective Power of Community

Friday, April 23rd, 2010

Whether you are a student or a seasoned professional, starting a business in the current economic climate can be extremely challenging.  In addition to inspiring innovation within companies, community programs can be instrumental in fostering innovative thinking and the establishment of new business.  In the St. Louis region, organizations have been developed to create collaboration among universities, corporations, government and non-profit enterprises.  Those combined resources offer support to individuals who are seeking a way to get their ideas off the ground.

  • At Washington University, the Skandalaris Center for Entrepreneurial Studies serves as a base for helping people connect their business goals with the community.  Their IdeaBounce program provides a virtual portal for sharing ideas on their web site.  The contributors can pitch them to a panel of community judges at regularly-scheduled events, and the winners receive a cash prize and mentoring from local community leaders.
  • St. Patrick Center, a non-profit organization, has developed programs to help professionals connect with resources they need to grow a successful business.  GO! Network provides growth and opportunity for entrepreneurial professionals and their BEGIN New Venture Center has a unique, hands-on plan for assisting start-ups.
  • InnovateVMS provides a team-based mentoring of innovative enterprises by experienced entrepreneurs and business leaders at no cost.
  • The St. Louis Innovation Camp , a 3-day interactive workshop at the University of Missouri in St. Louis, brought several speakers from the entrepreneurial, IT and marketing communities together in February to share their business experience and insight on Innovation, Start-up Management, Start-up Tech, Funding and Marketing.  Attendees had the opportunity to submit their ideas to compete for an Innovator’s Cup with a prize of support from participating businesses to help develop their business plan.
  • Entrepreneurs and enterprise can link up at The Start-Up Connection, a recurring venue designed to generate and encourage visionary ideas in the knowledge-driven, global marketplace.
  • Bounceback St. Louis hosts events and provides resources for helping talented people in career transition come together to find inventive ways to thrive in the post-recession economy.

Innovation can take many forms, but it often takes community collaboration to help bring it to life.  Fortunately, there is a cornucopia of it alive and well in Arch City.

What do you think? What local resources do you find helpful?

Photo Credit: Code Poet

Collaborating and Investing in Green Innovations

Monday, April 19th, 2010

There is increasing importance being placed on green innovation.  Nowadays when you walk into a Home Depot, Lowe’s, Target, Walmart or other home improvement or general shopping store, you are hit with 1,001 ways you can save on energy, recycle, or other methods to become more green.  But, the need to “go green” isn’t just within our homes.  Green innovation is becoming a major focus for companies of all sizes.  For example, the transportation industry is continually looking into new travel routes and alternative forms of fuel that will enable to not only reduce cost but also reduce their carbon footprint.  While you could probably rattle off a list of some immediate actions you could take within your office to go more green, there are more companies coming together to collaborate on other effective green innovations.

Several major corporations have begun developing communities and collaborating to advance environmentally friendly innovations.  Two main groups have formed over the past couple years: Eco-Patent Commons and Green Xchange.  Eco-Patent Commons is a collective consisting of IBM, Nokia, Pittney Bowes, Sony and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development.  According to a New York Times article, their mission is simple: “Pledge environmental patents to the commons, and anyone can use them – for free.”  Green Xchange is comprised of Creative Commons, Nike and Best Buy but takes a bit of a different angle.  Companies that contribute green patents to the Xchange have the option of charging a fixed annual licensing fee and can also instate restrictive licensing to keep competitors away.  Innovations created by one of these companies may have benefits for another in the group that they can license and roll out within their organization.  One example given in the New York Times article was that of Nike’s air-bag patent for cushioning shoes:

Nike’s air-bag patent for cushioning shoes is crucial to its core shoe business, but may have environmental benefits in other industries — perhaps in prolonging the useful life of tires. Green Xchange could enable Nike to license the air-bag technology selectively to noncompeting companies.

In fact, the need to “go green” and move forward green innovations is no longer an option for businesses, it is an imperative, according to Mark Atkins, CEO of Invention Machine, a Boston-based firm that helps companies design predictable and sustainable innovative processes.  To see why Mark thinks it is imperative for businesses to become more environmentally friendly, check out the below interview.

If you can’t see this video, you can also catch it on YouTube.

Has your company started moving towards being more environmentally friendly? In what ways is your company investing in green innovation?  Do you even think they should be investing in something like green innovation?

Photo Credit: Micky.l

10 Basic Principles of Innovation

Thursday, April 15th, 2010

Today’s post is from Matthew Greeley, Founder and CEO of Brightidea, the global leader in On-Demand Innovation Management software. Prior to founding Brightidea, Matthew consulted for Wrenchead.com, helping them raise over $100 million in venture funding from investors.  He holds a degree in Computer Engineering from Stevens Institute of Technology and studied Creativity and Marketing at Stanford University. In addition to his role at Brightidea, Matthew sits on the board of directors of ClearDay Technologies.

After 10 years of working in the trenches of innovation, I have attempted to distill down the ten MOST important concepts that I believe anyone working in this field should be aware of:

1. Product vs Process Innovation – In my opinion, this is the highest level break-out of the painfully broad term “Innovation”. Product innovation is developing a new product (iPhone). Process innovation is improving the processes employed to produce or deliver the product, and to make it more efficient or productive (eg. Robot welders on the factory floor at GM). Process innovation often falls under names like (Six Sigma or Operational Excellence). Generally product innovation is concerned with increasing revenue and process innovation with reducing costs. It’s very difficult to do both at the same time, for a given product, and the emergence of a “dominant design” is what triggers the shift of effort from product to process innovation. (see Utterbeck)

2. Scale of Innovation - While it may seem obvious, innovation happens at different scales. Broad-based adoption of Personal Computers in the 80s represented a “big” innovation and by contrast the mute button on your remote control is small. Scale is determined by: size of investment, time to ROI, change in user behavior, risk of success, risk of adoption, etc. and is a relative measure. While many terms are used, I prefer: Incremental, Sustaining & Disruptive (for small, medium and large). The non-obvious part is that it is important to always keep #1 & #2 in mind when thinking about innovation, because the rules are totally different if you are working on a incremental process improvement vs a disruptive new product.

3. Technology Adoption Curve – Adoption is the risk for any innovation. New tools and practices are not adopted overnight. Like a bottle of perfume opened in the corner that slowly spreads throughout the room, innovations slowly diffuse through society. Understanding this process is critical, as new ideas are embraced first by “early adopters” all the way through to “skeptics”. This is articulated in Marketing High Technology (Davidow) and more recently Crossing the Chasm (Moore).

4. The Innovators Dilemma – What if your new low cost model cannibalizes the revenue and profit from the old way of doing it? What if you have a Executive VP of Back Office Operations and your new electronic trading system requires no people to operate it? What if your new roll-out requires 10,000 people to be retrained. Most organizations have a natural immune system to change. In many areas this is a good thing… you wouldn’t want to change the location of headquarters every month. But with innovation these anti-bodies can block or kill the very initiatives they could have saved a firm when it’s industry is being transformed. (Christensen)

5. Skunkworks – It is often useful to separate a innovative business unit logically and physically from the rigors (standards, reporting, ROI) of the parent company. The term ‘Skunkworks’ derives from a Lockheed Martin group that was separated from the corporate parent and was very successful in developing many new airplanes. This technique was also employed at Apple by the Mac Group that took up separate offices and flew a pirate flag above their building. If you can’t have a separate building, at least create a “War Room” by permanently taking over a conference room and posting all relevant project information on the walls. It’s important for innovative groups to have their own identity so they can defend themselves from forces that might undo their best efforts.

6. Prototype & Iterate – Some flaws are just not that obvious until you try to use the product. On the first typewriters you couldn’t see what you were typing until the page came out of the machine 15-20 lines later! Visible type was considered an innovation in typewriters! Later someone invented the “Shift” key so that keyboards didn’t need separate keys for capital and lowercase letters! This is also why it is important to eat your own dog food so you feel what the user is feeling. It also implies there will be (minor) failures along the way, expect them. Most successful innovators will tell you to “Fail Fast!”. Persistence means when you are ready to throw in the towel, call it an iteration and go one more round.

7. Solutions not Technologies – There is a major difference between a technology and a solution. A technology sounds like this: “a networks of orbitals, that constantly send and receive geospatial data streams with synchronized clocks that triangulate position on spherical surface.” A solution sounds like this: “with this GPS, I will never get lost again, anywhere in the world”. There is much work to be done between a new technology and something that solves a problem, and not all technologies make it there. Ask yourself what specific job are you trying to make easier? What problem am I trying to solve? What is the one thing your user trying to do, and how can you help with it. Clarify those questions as precisely as you can, then focus all your energies on designing a solution for just that one task.

8. Economic Value – Despite your grand vision to change the world, the world will ask you to measure your innovation by much humbler means such as: How are you making something Cheaper/Faster/Better? Can we lay-off people if we buy your product? What are the trade-off costs? The switching costs? The trial costs? Why is it better than doing nothing at all? What is the payback? How long till we break even? Is the risk worth the reward? Understanding the nitty gritty of economic value (aka what people are willing to pay for, and why?) will help you sell your idea to the world.

9. Individuals Required – As you probably guessed by now, true innovation isn’t easy. Social pressures, set backs, bean counters… Along the way you will need to rock the boat a bit and probably even just outright break the rules. We’ve all heard the line “Ask for forgiveness not permission” – now you’ll have to live it. I have also heard it said “the defining trait of an entrepreneur is that they don’t need to ask anyone for permission.” If, along the way, you find yourself isolated, and struggling to hold back the nay-sayers, consider Ayn Rand’s quote “The noble soul has reverence for itself.”

10. Quality – The ancient Greeks had a concept called arête which meant quality or goodness. It’s hard to pin down the exact meaning, but it’s the type of thing ‘you know it when you see it’. Take one look at the iPhone and you can feel the Quality. Go to a typical DMV, and chances are you will see a lack of quality (no offense). Quality is important because people will give your new thing a try simply because they like the experience of touching something of quality, and that drives adoption. Quality, and the passion required to pursue it, in any field, is admirable and that gives you your shot.

Credits: James Utterbeck – Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, David Kelley – IDEO, William H. Davidow – Marketing High Technology, Geoffrey Moore – Crossing the Chasm, Clayton Christensen – The Innovator’s Dilemma, Denis Brown – Chairman, Brightidea Inc., Robert Pirsig – Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance.

Intimidation and the Nature of Innovation

Monday, April 12th, 2010

lightbulb

Today’s post is by AJ Leon, is the Co-Founder of the LaC project traveling over the world with his wife and business partner, helping charities embrace the social web and utilizing “real time” web technologies to empower third world communities.

I’ve been thinking about why it is we are so intimidated by the idea of innovation.  Could I ever be an “innovator”?  The reality is innovation is not always inventing the “big” thing.  Sometimes it’s using the “big” thing to do something that the original creator never intended

Are you intimidated by the idea of innovation? Have you ever thought of uses for existing inventions that maybe have not been accomplished yet?

Photo Credit: Vermin Inc